| Kendall R, Lawson J and Hurley
LA. New research and a clinical report on the use of Perna canaliculus
in the management of arthritis. Townsend Letter for Doctors
and Patients, 2000; 204:98-111
Introduction
This paper includes the results of a laboratory research
into the mechanisms of action of the mussel extract and also
those from a 4-year clinical study involving 120 patients
suffering osteo arthritis. The results, which originate from
a university and also a clinical practice in the USA are once
again excellent and fully support all the earlier positive
data for the product.
Sixty-four males and fifty-six females made up this group
with most patients in the age group of 60-70. Several of them
had been referred total knee replacement. All patients in
the study were provided information on the use of Green Lipped
Mussel (GLM) for degenerative joint disease. They were advised
that GLM Extract had been shown to have an anti-inflammatory
effect equal to that of Indocin but more importantly it had
a nutritive metabolic effect. The importance of mucopolysacharrides
(glycosaminoglycans) in the formation of basic proteoglycans
cartilage was stressed.
Patients with a known allergy to seafood, shellfish and alfalfa
were excluded from the study but patients who were taking
some form of NSAIDs or pain medication were allowed to continue
but were requested to keep a record of all medications required.
Pain Assessment
The Huskinson visual analogue pain scale was used to assess
pain where the pain intensity ranged from " no pain"
to "worst possible pain ". (Intensity
Scale Fig. 1.)
Inflammatory Index
An estimate of overall inflammatory activity of the joints
based upon clinical evidence of swelling, trauma, redness,
heat and pain was made. A history of " minutes of morning
stiffness" as well as daily activity, participation in
sports etc. was recorded by the patients.
The patient's opinion of their condition in comparison to
their initial state (same, a little better, a lot better,
worse, much worse) was recorded. The physician's evaluation
was also made at the time of each visit (excellent, good,
no change).
Notes were made as to tolerance of GLM Extract and compliance.
Notes were also made in reference to the use of NSAID's, pain
medication, tropical cream and ointments.
The patients were prescribed 3 GLM Extract capsules (a total
of 1500mg extract) per day taken with food and then 2 capsules
daily as a permanent maintenance dose. The product used in
the study contained 500mg GLM and 100mg alfalfa.
The study was designed to last one year and out of 120 patients,
only eleven were eventually elected for total knee replacement.
X-RAY evaluation
X-Rays of the patients were graded on the basis of a scale
of I to IV using the Kellgren and Lawrence system - degree
of osteoarthritis progressing by grade from grade I (minimal,
least, severe) to grade IV (bone on bone).
The response to management in these groups of patients studied
became evident at the time of the first follow-up visit. Many
grade I & II patients who had presented with an initial
analogue of 7 reported a 0 - 2. These patients continued to
remain comfortable and active during the rest of the study.
Evidence of pain, heat and swelling was noted to be significantly
diminished or absent during the remaining visits.
The two patients who were using canes no longer required
them. A significant number of patients were able to reduce
their NSAID intake by 50% or more. Most patients reported
that their condition was much improved. No patient complained
that his condition was worse.
Patient's and Practitioner's Assessments
95 patients reported of much improvement and 16 reported
of some improvement. 9 patients reported of no change.
According to the practitioner, 19 patients (27%) had shown
no improvement, 38 patients (31%) had shown good improvement
and 63 patients (52%) had made excellent progress.
11 patients did eventually come for joint replacement therapy
but felt that GLM protocol had bought them some more time.

|